Previous research shows that collective action to avoid a catastrophic threshold, such as a climate “tipping point,” is unaffected by uncertainty about the impact of crossing the threshold but that collective action collapses if the location of the threshold is uncertain. Theory suggests that behavior should differ dramatically either side of a dividing line for threshold uncertainty. Inside the dividing line, where uncertainty is small, collective action should succeed. Outside the dividing line, where uncertainty is large, collective action should fail. We test this prediction in the experimental lab. Our results strongly support the prediction: behavior is highly sensitive to uncertainty around the dividing line.
Director at Learning Change Project – Research on society, culture, art, neuroscience, cognition, critical thinking, intelligence, creativity, autopoiesis, self-organization, rhizomes, complexity, systems, networks, leadership, sustainability, thinkers, futures ++
320 Posts in this Blog
- Follow Learning Sustainability on WordPress.com
- Why some conservatives are blind to climate change
- Biodiversity loss is more than an environmental problem, it is a development, economic, social and moral issue
- What can a Green New Deal learn from other countries?
- Growing up in dirty air ‘quadruples chances of developing depression’
- Plummeting insect numbers ‘threaten collapse of nature’
- My Tweets